Defining the Problem
Barbara Saunders

          As of 1997, the state of Minnesota closed off tribal dumping grounds to the people of Red Lake and the surrounding communities therein.

The state installed dumpsters at two-mile increments along the roadside for people to dump trash.

          Along with over flowing dumpsters comes the over population of the American black bear. Treating the cans as feed lots the bears gather at road side and have grown accustomed to human activity and dragging bags of such garbage into the woods has caused more unnecessary pollution.

          Some people, afraid to dump trash in the dumpsters have taken to burning domestic garbage in their own backyards.

These fires include refuse from diapers to old tires, which is suspected to be the cause of some ground-water contamination due to chemical seepage.

Widespread grass fires are also a problem in the dry autumn months.

          During 1998, about 79 percent of all Minnesotans obtained their domestic water supplies from ground water and nearly 750 million gallons of ground water were withdrawn everyday. During the past 20 years, ground water withdrawals from glacial and bedrock aquifers in Minnesota have increased particularly for irrigation in sandy soils.

          Because of increased demands, state and local agencies are concerned about the effects of drought on water supplies, long-term sustainable yield of wells, effects on ground and surface water levels and interferences among nearby wells pumping from the same aquifer.

          Expansion of urban and industrialized areas and development of agricultural resources during the past fifty (50) years have affected some water resources. State and tribal water managers and the citizens of Minnesota are concerned about the effects of human activity and the quality of Minnesota’s streams, lakes, and ground water.

          The USGS is the leading federal agency in Minnesota that collects and interprets water resource data and information used by tribal resource managers, planners and the general public.

          To define the availability of water for public, irrigation and industrial supplies, the USGS monitors stream flow, lake levels and ground water levels at many locations and has studied aquifers in Minnesota.  To determine the quality of water in Minnesota’s streams and lakes, the USGS maintains four (4) surface water quality stations, two (2) sediment stations, twelve lake stations and one (1) precipitation station.

          A study of the Minnesota River Basin determined how suspended sediment; agricultural chemicals and bacteria impair use of lake and river water. Assessments are needed to identify the natural and human factors that affect the quality of the nation’s surface and ground water resources.

          The USGS National Water Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program was established to address these needs. NAWQA studies in the Red River and Upper Mississippi River basins investigate non-point and point source water quality issues in Minnesota and adjacent states.

          Only small amounts of agriculturally applied pesticides and nutrients have reached streams and shallow ground water. Streams draining areas with much cropland have the highest concentration of nutrients.

          Although differences in fish communities appear to be controlled by environmental factors, chemicals associated with modern industrial sources were widely detected in fish and stream sediment in the basin.

          The result of sampling in the Upper Mississippi River Basin suggests that urban use and pollution contribute to elevated concentrations of nutrients and several pesticides and synthetic organic compounds in ground water and streams.

          The quality of stream flows in most of Minnesota is controlled by ground water during periods of low snowfall. Tribal agencies are concerned about effects of ground water withdrawals on stream flow and water quality.

          There is also concern that contamination within the aquifers or the streams could adversely affect water supplies. 

          Recent USGS work in the Red River of the North basin used chemical dating methods to determine the age of water in a shallow aquifer.

The youngest water was near the surface of the aquifer, which also had the highest concentration of nitrate. The results have strong implications for nitrate transport in ground water, due to human pollution. These results have been useful in planning for ground water protection strategies.

                             Penalties and Consequences

          The illegal burning concerns have risen over dry autumn months. The consequences outweigh the penalties by far.

          The burning of tribal land or waste without proper permits results in a minimum fine of twenty (20) dollars. The maximum for this misdemeanor is one hundred dollars on private tribal property.

          The consequences of letting a waste fire burn unattended include uncontrollable grass fires leading to possible domestic fires and forestry ignition. Chemicals from these fires have been traced to seepage and runoff into ground water and aquifers.

                             The Solutions/ Conclusion

          As a sovereign we need to seek help from our tribal leaders on starting more educational programs concerning the effects of grass and chemical fires. The most realistic plans need to start on an elementary level and deal with ways to prevent situations before the occasional grass/chemical fire goes out of control. We should also see if we could get a safer dumping station for both human and our animals. A possibility might be having a more regular trash-collecting schedule. A recycling program would be effective but only if the citizens were willing to learn how to recycle properly and were provided with the bins at little or no charge.

          Law changes might include stiffer penalties for out of season, chemical, grass, and tire burning.  Regular water analysis and forestry clean up programs are also options that we can take to preserve our reservation. 

          In conclusion, I feel that we would be able to maintain a healthier reservation if we pull together as a community and work with government as well as local officials and plan for a long future on our land.

<< Back Table of Contents